As you know we have battled Australia Post for over a
year about the threats to transport member safety
presented by the move to introduce the new Mercedes
Sprinter vans without side windows.
We have consistently argued the vans are not fit for
purpose and that the lack of side windows severely
limits driver vision – and, therefore, safety. Now Post
has withdrawn its appeal.
Why has this happened?
On Monday 20 July the issue of safety with the Mercedes
Vans was again before the Industrial Relations
Commission (AIRC). Post was make submissions against
the decision of Comcare. Members will recall that
Comcare had found that:
- Australia Post had
breached
the Occupational Health and Safety Act (penalties apply)
and
- That
the use of the Mercedes Vans constituted a
“real risk”
to the health and safety of drivers and
- That
side windows may be required in Mercedes vans
However, just minutes before the time when Post had to
put a witness in the box to justify their position, Post
withdrew its appeal and agreed to the Improvement
Notice. Their evidence would have been interesting. For
example they told Comcare in writing that it would cost
$24.25 million to fit one window. Compare this with the
total cost of the 900 Vans - about $40 million. Then
their witness in a signed statement said it would cost
only $1.06 million. Then on the day they gave us an
update saying it would cost $0.74 million.
Post has now agreed that it will take action to prevent
any further breach or likely breach (of the law).
The CEPU had also appealed and our consent was needed to
allow the matter to proceed. We gave conditional
consent. This is recorded in the Order of the AIRC as
follows:
The intent of these steps is that Australia Post will
now proceed to comply with the Improvement Notice. The
CEPU will be free to pursue its appeal in the event that
it considers this necessary,
including if it is dissatisfied with the steps taken by
Australia Post to comply with the Improvement Notice or
if any adverse action is taken by Australia Post against
any member of the CEPU who refuses on safety grounds to
drive a Mercedes Benz Sprinter van….
The (CEPU) appeal is adjourned generally with liberty to
the appellant (CEPU) to apply to have the appeal
relisted on 2 days notice.
Where
to now?
Australia Post is required to publish the Improvement
Notice on all notice boards to alert other drivers to
the actions that Post must take to address the risks
associated with driving the vans.
In accordance with the Improvement notice Australia Post
is required to consult with drivers and the CEPU about
the safety issues associated with the lack of side
windows in the Mercedes vans. They must identify the
risks, assess the risks and implement risk control
measures to eliminate or minimise any risks, including
but not limited to
“the installation of additional windows”
where necessary. Our bans remain in force. It Post take
any action to threaten, disadvantage or otherwise
pressure you to drive a Mercedes Vans, and you agree
with Comcare that a real risk exists to your health and
safety, then
contact us immediately.
Do not make any statements or take a risk by driving a
van under threat!